🔗 Share this article

Via an per curiam ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court permitted Texas to use a newly configured congressional boundary scheme that could add up to five new conservative-tilting districts. The 6-3 order, issued on Thursday, approves a petition by the state to overturn a district court's block that had invalidated the boundaries in November.

Court's Reasoning

The district court erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating significant confusion and disrupting the delicate federal-state balance in elections, the justices wrote in justifying its action.

The federal court had determined that Texas had probably sorted voters according to their race – a act known as illegal race-based districting – when it adopted the new maps. It had ordered the state to revert to the districts created after the most recent national count for the forthcoming election.

Sharp Dissenting Opinion

Through a forcefully written dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the court's action. She contended that it undermined the work of the lower court, pointing out that its ruling was actually authored by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan argued in a opinion co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, Today's ruling ensures that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its boosted favoritism, will control next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas voters, without justification, will be sorted in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has stated year in and year out, is a violation of the law of the land.

National Redistricting Struggle

The court's action occurs during a countrywide fight over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in efforts to transform the U.S. House map to secure a slim Republican majority. Typically, boundary revision takes place after a ten-year survey. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to initiate a aggressive mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year triggered a chain reaction among other states.

Conservative legislators in including North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that could add a number of more GOP-friendly seats. Democrats, for their part, have responded with new maps in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Political Reactions

Lone Star State top lawyer hailed the High Court's decision. In a release, he said the order protected Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that guarantees representation favorable to the GOP. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he remarked.

In contrast, opposition party leaders criticized the decision. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the chair of a major Democratic election organization.

Another leading Democratic figure said the court had yet again damaged its standing by upholding a racially gerrymandered map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he stated.